Re: [CR] Question on vintage Cinelli

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:06:57 +0100
From: "Hilary Stone" <hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: loudeeter@aol.com
References: <261267.6136.qm@web51602.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <8CCEA692B77F226-1814-18361@webmail-d097.sysops.aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <8CCEA692B77F226-1814-18361@webmail-d097.sysops.aol.com>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Question on vintage Cinelli


This isn early 60s Cinelli frame which has been extensively modernised - the rear dropouts are the earlier Campag long slot type with the hole for the Sport spring, the BB has oil /grease ports, the chainstay bridge has a mudguard mount and the seatclamp bolt is the hex nut type. But the seatstay bridge has been replaced with a more modern one - 60s Cinelli often require a deep drop rear brake... And I think the fork is a more modern one too... The paint is also much neweer and certainly not original! Hilary Stone, Bristol, British Isles

loudeeter@aol.com wrote:
> The aero mounted shifters make me think back to the early 80s aero period, but I suppose they could have been added later. Not sure what to make of this. Lou Deeter, Orlando FL USA
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Jue <fyrtom@yahoo.com>
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Sent: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 10:47 am
> Subject: [CR] Question on vintage Cinelli
>
>
> Greetings List. I trust that all had a safe and memorable 4th? I've come
> across what looks to me a strange combination of (newer) paint scheme, rear
> brake bridge, fork crown; and (older) build, i.e., the screw ports on its bottom
> bracket. Can anyone please tell me this is some kind of vintage Cinelli history
> hybrid, or does it seem like the real McCoy? No relation of course to the
> listing at eBay: http://tiny.cc/m47xm
> Cheers,
> Tom M. Jue
> San Francisco, CA