Re: [CR]Bottom line, KOF - Extended Headlugs

(Example: Framebuilders)

Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:20:31 -0800
From: "Kurt Sperry" <haxixe@gmail.com>
To: "Raymond Dobbins" <raydobbins2003@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Bottom line, KOF - Extended Headlugs
In-Reply-To: <20060316181006.65016.qmail@web60414.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <031620061753.16644.4419A6170009F40E0000410422007507840207010C0C03D206@comcast.net>
cc: j.mccoin@comcast.net
cc: j.mccoin@comcast.net

On 3/16/06, Raymond Dobbins <raydobbins2003@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not an expert on Rivendell's, but from what I've heard about them and
> seen (for the first time today) on their website, the extended headlug mu st
> be for the purpose of placng the stem and bar higher, for a more upright
> riding position, without compromising standover clearance.

Perhaps I'm the exception, but I've never had any problem getting an optima l position or lacking standover clearance on a traditional non-extended headtube frame. And they, to my eyes, look heinous. How did we cope for 100+ years without them?!?

Kurt Sperry Bellingham WA

--

> fineartscrimshaw.com