Re: [CR]re: riv lugs

(Example: Production Builders:Frejus)

Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:33:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Joe Starck" <josephbstarck@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]re: riv lugs
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <000101c64c45$2e760a20$6401a8c0@oemcomputer>
cc: "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>


--- "C. Andrews" wrote:


> Mark Stonich and then Joe Starck wrote:
>
> Grants lugs look like they were designed by a
> > committee, or came from
> > 3 different sets. Hardly hideous, but with
> awkward
> > transitions and
> > no coherent theme. Don't let me get started on
> that
> > fork
> > crown. Acceptable on a lesser bike, but not
> worthy
> > of the
> > craftsmanship lavished on the bikes by Curt and
> > painter Joe Bell.
>
> http://rivendellbicycles.com/html/membership_rivendell39.html
> Mark,
> Look at the photo of the head lugs and fork crown.
> Your words above cannot possibly follow. Ol'
> Grantersen has a beautiful bike there, with the
> cream
>
> ********
>
> All depends on who's lookin'. To me, Mark's words
> are
> exactly right. Even charitable. To Joe, they're
> not.
> This kind of thing distills down to "I think this is
> second-rate amateur work" or "I think this is
> beautiful,
> original, thinking about lugs."

Hoo boy. Charles Andrews skews the argument into a false dichotomy one sentence before he preaches logic to me below.

I'm with the first
> statement and with Mark Stonich, and for what I
> think are
> perfectly legitimate reasons. Joe disagrees. For
> Joe to
> accuse Mark, or anyone else, of being pea-brained
> for not
> liking Grant's lug design (and for saying so in a
> clear way,
> with reasons) is just worthless ad-hominem attack.

I commited no such attack, Charles. My phrasing scolded Stonich for his over-the-top praise of Goodrich & Bell at the expense of the credible efforts that allow a Riv to come into being -- like designing the lugs & crown under constaints -- before the builder or painter do their thing. I merely asked Stonich to temper his critique upon a look-see of a bigger picture. Back to the distillery for you, Charles.
> I have a custom Riv, and I'll probably keep it, but
> I'll
> always wish I'd had the Sachs lugs put on it. So it
> goes.
> The fancy-lugged Carpenter will make me feel better.
> It's
> what a fancy-lugged frame should look like--as is
> something
> like a fancy Hurlow. Grant would have done well to
> spend a
> couple of months contemplating a vintage Hurlow--or
> an
> Ephgrave--with the most florid lugs before he even
> put
> pencil to paper.

Maybe Grant sought a look less "florid" and more -- knucklier -- hoo aah! Joe Starck Madison, WI USA

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com